Blog – Full Width

by

Croatians ‘sleep-walking’ into destroying tourism with Adriatic energy industry

3220a35a-6295-4201-a5c6-aa6ae7c06dc0-2060x1236An ancient walled city on a sparkling sea, surrounded by beaches and backed by the Dinaric Alps, Budva in Montenegro is one of dozens of Venetian-influenced towns along the Adriatic coast and the centrepiece of a tourism boom.

Holidaymakers are drawn by Croatian islands such as Hvar, favoured by yachters, and Pag, popular with partygoers and foodies alike, as well as the famous city of Dubrovnik, known as the “Pearl of the Adriatic”. However, concerns are rising that this could all be jeopardised by the growth of the oil and gas industry.

Amid growing opposition to offshore development in one of Europe’s top travel destinations, a conference promoting Adriatic oil and gas exploration is being held in Budva on Tuesday. Government ministers, energy industry executives and financiers will discuss “key legal issues surrounding oil and gas exploration”.

The keynote speaker is Cherie Booth, wife of the former prime minister Tony Blair, in her capacity as chair of Omnia Strategy, a law firm she set up to “provide strategic counsel to governments”, including those of Gabon and Kazakhstan.

Supporters say offshore oil and gas in the Adriatic could help Europe reduce its reliance on Russian energy imports. Opponents warn that exploration will damage tourism and could have grave environmental consequences. Under mounting pressure, the prime minister of neighbouring Croatia, Zoran Milanović, has proposed a referendum on exploration.

Paul Bradbury, who runs tourism websites from Hvar, said “Oil and gas is tourism suicide. Croatians are sleep-walking into this irreversible path without a proper public-awareness campaign. Hvar is the sunniest island in Europe, but it is also reliant on its pristine seas.”

Croatia, the EU’s newest member, launched its first tender for offshore oil and gas blocks last year. This was beginning of a process that it hopes will bring in $2.5bn (£1.7bn) of investment over five years to an economy that has barely grown since 2008.

The tender applied to an area of 14,000 sq miles (36,823 sq km) from the Istrian peninsula – billed as “the new Tuscany” – to near the mouth of Montenegro’s Bay of Kotor, a mountain-fringed gulf dotted with attractive limestone villages.

The first licences are due to be awarded next month, with the remaining blocks going to a second tender in September.

Montenegro has held a similar tender for offshore oil and gas exploration blocks covering 1,200 sq miles, and announced in February that it had started initial negotiations with bidders. To the south, Albania has been undertaking seismic studies of offshore resources, and companies including Shell are already active onshore.

Critics say that the benefits of oil and gas development are outweighed by the potential risks to the environment and the tourism sector. Exploration would be allowed up to about six miles (10km) from the mainland and four miles from the islands.

“This is contradictory to 20 years of work on the tourism industry and could kill Croatia’s whole brand,” said Tanja Gutenmorgen, a member of the Clean Adriatic Sea Alliance (CASA), an anti-drilling activist group, and the owner of a high-end tourism business.

“People come because of pristine untouched nature. Nobody wants to bathe in a sea where they see oil rigs, platforms, tankers and pipelines, or see the onshore infrastructure. We all have villas and apartments that we offer to tourists for the view of the sea. This is like putting an elephant in a tiny shop full of filigree. We will fight it until our last breath.”

Vjeran Piršić, a local councillor on the island of Krk and head of an environmental organisation, told the Guardian that he feared an oil spill worse than the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. He and CASA claim that currents in the Adriatic mean a spill off the eastern shore would be pushed northwards towards Venice, permanently damaging the pebbly beaches along the coastline.

Piršić said: “This is a question of human life, and also the economy, which is dependent on tourism and fishing. Local communities are now mobilising.”

CASA, which advocates replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy, says oil extraction could earn Croatia as little as $400m, a figure dwarfed by annual tourism revenues, which reached $9.5bn last year from 11 million holidaymakers, according to the UN World Tourism Organisation. This claim is strongly rebutted by the Croatian Hydrocarbons Agency, which says its conservative estimate of oil and gas revenues is $1bn a year.

Croatia’s tourism industry was devastated by the country’s 1991-95 war, but has been painstakingly rebuilt over the past two decades. Visitor numbers only returned to pre-war levels in 2012. Montenegro has one of the world’s fastest-growing tourism sectors, according to the World Tourism and Travel Council, and is increasingly popular with Europe’s glitterati and Russians buying second homes.

The billionare financier Nat Rothschild held his 40th birthday in Porto Montenegro, a glitzy resort on the Bay of Kotor in which he is an investor, with guests including Peter Mandelson and Roman Abramovich.

Barbara Dorić, the head of the Croatian Hydrocarbons Agency, which is running the exploration tenders, told the Guardian that tourism in Croatia had co-existed with the oil and gas sectors in Croatia for 40 years, and Italy had more than 140 gas platforms and oil rigs in its Adriatic waters. She added that environmental protection standards had to meet stringent EU directives.

Dorić said: “We insisted on the strictest criteria for the preservation of the environment. Tourism is the most important industry in our country, which cannot and will not be endangered with this project.”

Sources close to the process insisted that few oil rigs would be visible from the coast, and gas fields were attracting more attention.

Some in the tourism sector are less pessimistic than CASA about hydrocarbons development. Tihomir Nikolas, head of a major tourist association, said he was not opposed to new explorations but wanted more thorough consultation, monitoring and management.

“Certainly, we are concerned about any potential risk of contamination in the Adriatic,” said Boris Šuljić, owner of a boutique hotel on Pag. “But all indications are that there will in fact be gas exploration in the Adriatic, which is less risky then oil exploration. We believe that the highest standards of environmental protection will be applied.

“The Adriatic is one of the cleanest and most beautiful seas in the world and I am sure that our government and citizens will make the best decisions in order for it to remain that way.”

Despite this, Milanović – who faces a re-election battle this year – appeared to back down last week in the face of mounting opposition to exploration, calling for a referendum “to see if we want to exploit minerals and raw materials”.

Luka Orešković, co-chair of the Emerging Europe business and government group at Harvard University, and a Zagreb political insider, said: “Milanović sees quick benefits of a populist measure particularly for parts of the electorate that rely on tourism for their livelihood.

“The opposition to the oil and gas process is extremely insubstantial in terms of actual arguments, but two years after the tenders were announced, it’s become a key issue. If it goes to a referendum, it’s a question of how it is phrased, but it could be the end, as popular sentiment has turned very much against.”

Meanwhile, Booth’s role is coming under scrutiny. In a statement issued to the Guardian on Friday, CASA said it could not “comment on what relevance the former prime minister’s wife role as an advocate and lobbyist might mean to the Adriatic”.

But it added: “We suspect, based upon her previous actions, it won’t be in the common interest of the population, the natural heritage, fisheries or tourism industries.”

Asked by the Guardian if Booth was aware of the growing controversy over Adriatic oil exploration, Omnia Strategy said in a statement: “Mrs Blair will stress the importance of implementing international best practices to efficiently address key social and environment challenges.”

by

Southern Gas Corridor, response to EU energy security challenges

download (2)The Southern Gas Corridor should be steered at the highest political level in Europe and Belgium, in addition to Azerbaijan.

Marc Verwilghen, the former Belgian energy minister and director at the TEAS Brussels Office, made the remark at the Azerbaijan–Belgium: Co-operation in Energy and Beyond international conference – jointly organized by leading Belgian energy infrastructure specialist Fluxys and The European Azerbaijan Society.

More than 120 specially invited diplomats, ministers, Belgian politicians and businesspeople attended the event held on March 10, according to the TEAS.

“The creation of a pipeline system carrying Azerbaijani hydrocarbon resources to Europe, via Turkey, began a decade ago, breaking the Russian monopoly over the exporting of Caspian energy resources and providing Europe with an important source of diversification,” said Verwilghen further noting that the importance of this strategy cannot be underestimated.

Addressing the event, Natig Aliyev, the Azerbaijani energy minister stressed that such successful EU–Azerbaijani energy projects as the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan oil and Baku–Tbilisi– Erzurum gas pipelines have already demonstrated the role of Azerbaijan in ensuring energy security

“The joint EU–Azerbaijani declaration on the Southern Gas Corridor was signed in Baku in 2011, recognizing Azerbaijan as a substantial contributor to and enabler of the Corridor, with a significant role in providing a new source of gas to Europe,” he said.

The 3,500-kilometer South Gas Corridor that would finally end Europe’s dependence on a single pipeline started with the go-ahead to the South Caucasus Pipeline Expansion, which will connect the Sangachal terminal with eastern Turkey through Georgia. It will link up with the SOCAR-led TANAP to be connected with a third pipeline TAP on the Turkish-Greek border.

Aliyev went on to say the EU, many financial institutions and all partners have reconfirmed their commitment to the Southern Gas Corridor. “The project requires the drilling of 26 subsea wells, construction of a new refinery in Sanganchal and development of the SPCX to increase its capacity. Around 25 percent of the Southern Corridor is completed and first gas will come to Europe by 2020,” he added.

Didier Reynders, the Belgian deputy prime minister and foreign minister, continued that this massive project will bring Azerbaijani gas to European markets, and change the energy landscape across the continent.

“Fluxys is collaborating very closely with the Azerbaijani state energy company SOCAR. Fluxys is now offering its gas transit services to its Greek counterpart, DESFA, so its role in this essential project will further increase,” he said.

Azerbaijani hydrocarbon developments will impact European energy security, including that of Belgium, said Stephen Gallogly, Head of Europe, Middle East and Africa Division at the International Energy Agency.

“It is now the turn of natural gas to add another success to Azerbaijan’s energy development. The Southern Gas Corridor will help diversify sources of energy for Europe, away from Russian dominance. Azerbaijan’s contribution to the Southern Gas Corridor is essential.

“By 2020, coal-fired power stations will be decommissioned across Europe, as will most nuclear power stations. There will be a greater requirement for gas imports, and the Southern Gas Corridor is designed to potentially carry gas from Eastern Europe, the Mediterranean, Central Asia, Iraq and Iran, amongst other countries,” he said noting that however the first gas will be the very Azerbaijani.

Fluxys CEO Walter Peeraer, in turn, emphasized that the Azerbaijani gas will be the new complementary source for Europe.

“I appreciate the current and future potential of Azerbaijan in ensuring the energy security of Europe. Our partnership in TAP is for the long-term, and a transmission operator we are sharing our expertise and bringing value to the project,” he noted.

The approximately 870 km long TAP will connect with the Trans Anatolian Pipeline near the Turkish-Greek border at Kipoi, cross Greece and Albania and the Adriatic Sea, before coming ashore in Southern Italy.

TANAP construction is due to be completed in 2018 and TAP in 2020 with first gas deliveries to Europe planned in the same year. The cost of the work on all four elements of the Southern Gas Corridor was estimated at almost $55-48 billion, according to the preliminary data.

by

Azerbaijan’s SOCAR seeks company to check feasibility of Albania gas project

BP-SOCAR-Discuss-ACG-Fields-Development-in-AzerbaijanBAKU, March 9 (Reuters) – Azerbaijan state energy company SOCAR plans to announce a tender to find a company to conduct a feasibility study on Albania’s gas infrastructure plan as part of European efforts to reduce dependence on gas from Russia.

Albania and Azerbaijan signed a preliminary agreement in December to cooperate in development of an Albanian gas grid as the Balkan country leads construction of the European section of the project to bring Azeri gas to Europe from the Shah Deniz II field in the Caspian Sea.

The so-called southern corridor will bring gas to Turkey and Greece, as well to Italy via Albania and the Adriatic Sea.

“SOCAR will announce this tender in the next three months,” Murad Heydarov, adviser to SOCAR’s president, told Reuters.

“We should draft the feasibility study before the end of 2015, and if this project is considered effective, we will start Albania’s gasification project in March next year.”

Heydarov estimated the project’s cost at “several hundred million dollars”.

Azeri gas could reach southern Europe by the end of this decade through the proposed Trans Adriatic Pipeline and the Trans Anatolian Pipeline.

These pipelines would carry billions of cubic metres of gas a year from Shah Deniz II, one of the world’s largest gas fields, which is being developed by a BP-led consortium.

by

ENERGY TO 2050 Scenarios for a Sustainable Future

Analysing the intersection between energy and climate change mitigation
issues requires the adoption of a very long-term perspective. Energy
infrastructure takes a very long time to build and has a useful life often
measured in decades. New energy technologies take time to develop and
even longer to reach their maximum market share. Similarly, the impact of
increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases from human activities
develops over a very long period (from decades to centuries), while policy
responses to climate change threats may only yield effects after
considerable delay. Analysis that seeks to tackle these issues must take a
similarly long term view – looking ahead at least thirty to fifty years.
Unfortunately, analysis of such time frames is an uncertain science. The
future is by definition unknown and cannot be predicted. While over time
horizons of ten years the inertia of the energy/economy system is so
strong as to leave little room for change, over longer periods, the future will
almost certainly look different than the present.

[gview file=”https://info.aea-al.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/IEA-Energy-to-2050-Scenarios-for-a-Sustainable-Future.pdf” save=”1″]

by

Volunteers Are Getting united

Proin eget tortor risus. Curabitur arcu erat, accumsan id imperdiet et, porttitor at sem. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Donec velit neque, auctor sit amet aliquam vel, ullamcorper sit amet ligula. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Donec sollicitudin molestie malesuada. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Donec sollicitudin molestie malesuada.

Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Donec velit neque, auctor sit amet aliquam vel, ullamcorper sit amet ligula. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat. Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Nulla porttitor accumsan tincidunt. Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit. Donec rutrum congue leo eget malesuada. Quisque velit nisi, pretium ut lacinia in, elementum id enim. Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui.

Curabitur non nulla sit amet nisl tempus convallis quis ac lectus. Mauris blandit aliquet elit, eget tincidunt nibh pulvinar a. Quisque velit nisi, pretium ut lacinia in, elementum id enim. Pellentesque in ipsum id orci porta dapibus. Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui. Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Nulla quis lorem ut libero malesuada feugiat. Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit. Nulla porttitor accumsan tincidunt.

by

Russia and Turkey agree on Turkish Stream onshore route

Gazprom and Turkey have agreed the general route for the onshore section of the Turkish Stream pipeline. The first line of the 180 kilometer pipeline is expected to be completed by December 2016, according to company CEO Aleksey Miller.

“We have identified and put on the map also the on-ground passage of the Turkish Stream gas pipeline for further exploration and project work,” Miller told journalists on Sunday. “This is the key news.”

Landfall will be near the village of Kiyikoy, and a delivery hub for Turkish consumers will be close to the town of Luleburgaz. The pipeline will terminate on the Turkish-Greek border in the area of Ipsila.

Permission to carry out design and survey work in the new Turkish offshore section is expected soon.

Gazprom is ready to supply 47 billion cubic meters of gas per year to Europe via Turkish Stream, it said in a statement.

“We’ll direct the capacity of the gas pipe’s first line, 15.75 billion cubic meters, fully to the Turkish market. Considering the degree of readiness of the Russkaya compressor station and the larger part of the route, this time frame is absolutely reali

stic,” said Miller.

turkish-stream

On December 1 Gazprom and Turkey’s Botas Petroleum Pipeline Corporation signed a memorandum of understanding on the construction of the gas pipeline from Russia to Turkey under the Black Sea.

Turkish Stream is an alternative to the South Stream project cancelled by Russia in December 2014 due to the EU’s unwillingness to support the 63 billion cubic meters capacity pipeline.

The route of Turkish Stream across the Black Sea will match much of that previously agreed for South Stream.